[04/09/22: The mode of ingress for the malicious mobbing data might not be that clear in Airtool captures but I suspect that monitoring Comcast access points or other hotspots, or monitoring the radios of victim devices, would at least indicate a disturbance. I’ve often wondered if they are able to broadcast directly to the speakers in the environment or rely on a radio signal to overlay all devices.]
Tonight I’m in the San Francisco East Bay at a home that not only has Comcast subscription television, but a cordless landline. Over the course of the real estate mobbing that has victimized me in my northeast Seattle home, I’ve abandoned a cordless phone for a cell phone and Comcast for Century Link, and then for over-the-air television. But in the East Bay, I stay in the home of an elderly relative whose hearing has changed and become much less sensitive. In this house, I lack control over the services that are in use and over the volume at which they are used.
As I’ve noted before, the mobbers freely mob me over the television here, despite the presence of my relative. And I suspect that in the same way the mobbers pretended that a “party line” suddenly existed at my Seattle home when the voices of the south mobbing house owner and his then-franchise family girlfriend turned up on my phone line whenever I made a call, they “phreak” the cordless phone in this house, perhaps forwarding robocalls in a ploy to activate the speaker on the cordless phone base station, and then using the open channel to mob from inside the victim home.
In much the same way, in this obvious real world deployment of the techniques of cyberbullies, the mobbers of northeast Seattle use the Comcast lines, the vents and the water pipes, to get inside the house and mob their victims from the privacy of their own homes, to mob them from close quarters from which the verbal abuse becomes impossible to escape. Unless, that is, you capitulate and leave your home for good.
Anyway, it’s late now, and I’d like to get up and swim before work tomorrow. So let me put out this idea, or rather, this appeal: To stop racketeers like the mobbers of northeast Seattle, the Washington State Attorney or Justice Department may have to get subpoenas to monitor the communication and entertainment lines of mobbing victims like me. If the back office systems don’t exist to do it, a white hat hacker could probably figure out how. But someone who understands video diversion, radio interference and the other technologies that are likely involved, and someone who can sort them out from the effects of directional speakers, must be consulted. The mobbers’ kitchen sink methods appear to be intended to confuse those who are unfamiliar with these technologies, even the police and the courts. And mobbers won’t be caught by those who reject victim claims out of ignorance. It’s possible that if, for example, these criminal speculators transmit or inject video packets into the victim service, that they are able to make use of standby mode, even when the television is off in the middle of the night, to activate speakers and ensure that their victims have no quiet. In the end, however, some of the mobbers’ tricks may consist of nothing more than an unlicensed detective sitting in a car, or a drone deployed to a parked vehicle, from which a video, radio or cellular signal can be relayed to the victim residence.
I don’t know how the radio signals are injected into the Comcast lines, and I’m not sure of the platform they use to mob over the phone. There seem to be numerous ways to affect the devices of others, including diversion of a video signal using a linear antenna, or CB radio and a linear antenna, maybe malware on a television, or a drone acting as a low-power radio or TV station. But if the sound of the mobbing harassment is not only audible on television and radio but can be modulated and affected by detuning and tuning stations on TV, radio, and phone, or by adjusting the volume of the radio, phone or TV, there’s a good chance that remote monitoring of the victim’s television or radio at the tuner should allow for the mobbing harassment to be forensically captured. In the workplace, decoy phones positioned near the mobbing victim might just do the trick.
With the regrettable state of drone law in this country, in which the FAA rule on registering drones was overturned some months back, and with the lack of drone radar and transponders, there appears to be no easy way to investigate what may be one of the most likely means the mobbers’ have used in their campaign to terrorize me out of my home these last years. With front windows that are fully exposed to Lake Washington, and bike rides along the Burke-Gilman rail trail, use of a drone to transmit the harassment in certain scenarios seems highly likely. And whatever the methods are that have been used against me, the real estate mobbers of northeast Seattle appear to be an organized group of criminals who have harnessed a panoply of methods to force the turnover of properties. They have probably done this to others or they were probably taught how to do it by others. Real estate mobbing as practiced in northeast Seattle, is a real estate scam. And countermeasures like that offered by DroneShield (“Watch this drone gun jam a flying drone,” Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/videonational/watch-this-drone-gun-jam-a-flying-drone/2016/11/30/2e733c82-b70f-11e6-939c-91749443c5e5_video.html?utm_term=.eabafa46c2cd) are out of reach of private citizens. Not to mention the fact that their use would probably be ruled illegal.
This is racketeering, plain and simple. It’s time for those who engineered the technology that is increasingly making consumers victims of organized crime, for those who profit off of its proliferation and sale, to provide solutions for the capture and prosecution of criminals who use that technology to prey on their victims.
Leave a Reply